Fantasy Island

Senator Melvin was on the Buckmaster[i] show recently where he once again implied the state funds public education at $9K per pupil. This despite AZ Fact Check[ii] proving it false during his 2012 campaign and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee’s report that state-only funding per student has been less than $5K every year since FY04.[iii]  In fact, Arizona leads the nation in cuts to per pupil funding since 2008 – almost 22%.[iv]

Image

These facts are important because one of Melvin’s key issues is “universal school choice where every child in the state has $9K, which is roughly what we are spending now…”[v]  Forget that a state appeals court ruled vouchers for private schools unconstitutional in 2009.[vi] With over $1 million students in the state, the total bill is over $9 billion, more than the state’s entire budget for 2013. This isn’t a bold new idea, it is fantasy.

Invest Early to Shape Our Destiny

The New York Times recently reported that the problem with education performance in America today is one of inequity of opportunity more than a failure of our educational institutions.

Image

The problem though, begins much earlier than college. It starts even before a child attends their first day of school. Children start kindergarten at different levels of preparedness. Children from wealthier families have numerous advantages in their environment that poorer children never experience. That’s one of the reasons preschool is important. It helps ensure all children are more ready to excel in kindergarten and beyond.

According to the Annie E. Casey Foundation’s Kids Count Data Book, “two out of three children don’t attend preschool, 27 percent live in poverty and three-quarters of fourth-graders aren’t proficient in reading. In fact, Arizona ranks 47th overall in the annual survey, moving down a notch from last year. Bruce Liggett, executive director of the Arizona Child Care Association and a former state child-care program administrator said: “People think about day care as just someplace where a child goes. They don’t understand that a child is learning every waking moment and that the quality of those experiences affects their development.”

 

Although 39 other states do, Arizona no longer funds any kind of early-childhood education and four years ago, lawmakers imposed a waiting list for the state’s child-care subsidy program. Since that time, an estimated 33,000 eligible children have been denied subsidies and in 2010, legislators eliminated a $20 million early-childhood block grant in order to balance the state budget. The following year, they eliminated funding for a subsidy program for low-income working parents.[i]

This is important because it’s not just the children who sometimes need help catching up. Arizona’s First Things First program is one of those programs designed to serve not only the child, but the entire family, and their communities as well. Passed by a landslide in November 2006, and funded through a tobacco tax, Proposition 203 was a citizen’s initiative designed to fund quality early childhood development and health. It provided $10 million in matching funds so Arizona could continue to get federal child care dollars which provided a head start seat for 40% of those eligible. First Things First ensued and has been a critical partner in creating a family-centered, comprehensive, collaborative and high-quality early childhood system that supports the development, health and early education of all Arizona’s children birth through age five. Unfortunately, the recent sequester cut $9.5 million from Arizona child-care and preschools.[ii]

Investment in early education for disadvantaged children from birth to age 5 is especially helpful in reducing the achievement gap, the need for special education, increases the likelihood of healthier lifestyles, lowers the crime rate, and reduces overall social costs. In fact, every dollar invested in high-quality early childhood education produces a 7 to 10 percent per annum return on investment. Policies that provide early childhood educational resources to the most disadvantaged children produce greater social and economic equity. We can create a more level and playing field by smart investments in effective education. “Historically, broad educational gains have been the biggest driver of American economic success; hence the economist’s rule of thumb that an increase of one year in a country’s average schooling level corresponds to an increase of 3 to 4 percent in long-term economic growth.”[iii]

It all boils down to this – we can pay now or we can pay later. We can invest early to prevent achievement gaps, or we can fix disparities later when it is harder to do and costs us more. It’s not just about cost though. Investing early lets us be proactive to shape our destiny. Investing later makes us react to missed opportunities. I know I’d rather be “in control” than “be controlled”.

[i] AZ Child Welfare Still Lags, AZCentral.com, June 24, 2013

[iii] NY Times June 16, 2013 The Great Divide

The Truth About Common Core

First of all, let’s set the record straight.  The Common Core Standards are not a curriculum.  They are a clear set of shared goals and expectations for what knowledge and skills will help our students succeed. The workplace is very different than it was even ten years ago and teachers today must prepare students for a world of possibilities that may not yet exist. The ability to effectively communicate, collaborate, and adapt to situations will be critical to ensuring we remain competitive in a highly globalized market.[i]  Local teachers, principals, superintendents and others are critical to making this happen and will decide how the standards are to be met. Teachers will continue to devise lesson plans and tailor instruction to the individual needs of the students in their classrooms.

Image

Secondly, they were not developed by the Federal government or the current administration, but by the nation’s governors and education commissioners, through their representative organizations the National Governors Association (NGA) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO).  The education reform movement began in 1996 when the nation’s governors and corporate leaders founded Achieve, Inc. as a bi-partisan organization to raise academic standards, graduation requirements, improve assessments, and strengthen accountability in all 50 states.  This led to the launch of the American Diploma Project (ADP) in 2005, the initial motivation for development of the Common Core Standards.[ii]  Teachers, parents, school administrators and experts from across the country together with state leaders provided input into the development of the standards.[iii]  In fact, our very own Dr. McCallum, head of the Department of Mathematics at the University of Arizona, was a lead author of the Common Core Math Standards.[iv]

There can be no doubt that one of the reasons the United States rose quickly to its super power status is our commitment to providing every citizen a public education.  This was a new concept that helped us make the most of our most valuable resource…our people.  It is also what helped make the American Dream a reality for so many.  Unfortunately, that dream is now no longer a given – studying and working hard no longer guarantee that you’ll be better off than your parents were.

Fear mongering over “the Obama administration federal take-over of education” is simply that, and diverts focus away from the real threats to our public education system.  Instead, we should be concerned about the corporate influence in the form of venture philanthropy as opposed to the more traditional philanthropy.  The difference of course being that the traditional philanthropists supported the work of others and the venture philanthropists view their giving as entryways into that work.  The 1983 report by the Reagan administration, A Nation at Risk, set the stage for the business elite to look at public education as a profit center.  The leading venture philanthropies are now pushing charter-school growth, school choice, and education privatization in general; alternative routes of teacher and administrator certification; and curriculum and test development.  Unfortunately, all this drives a transition from public deliberation by elected officials to decisions of individuals with no accountability to the public.[v]

Opportunity, that most fundamental American value, is now at risk for so many.  It is at risk, not because of some imagined plot to nationalize education, but because we are refusing to deal with the real threats – poverty and a lack of respect for our teaching professionals whom I believe can fix what’s wrong if we’ll just give them what they need and get out of their way.  Learn more at www.azed.gov/azcommoncore.

Opportunity is a fundamental American value

ImageOur country was founded and developed on the idea that if one got an education and worked hard, they could achieve great things.  In fact, our social contract established that income inequality was okay as long a parent and his/her children could advance to a better position. It is no longer true in America that one can advance through education and hard work and that, is the major threat we face as a country.[i]

The changing demographics of Arizona and our Nation along with the impact that the circumstances of your birth can have on the opportunities for one’s life, are creating a real challenge we must address. In Arizona, Latinos currently represent almost one-third of Arizona’s total population and 43% of our K-12 students.  In fact, Arizona is now home to more Latinos under the age of 18 than any other ethnic population group.[ii]  This is important because it is projected that 62% of Arizona’s jobs will require more than a secondary education by 2018. According to the Census Bureau however, only 35% of adults 25- years and older had a college degree in 2010. Among Latinos, the fastest growing population in this majority-minority state, that number is twice as few, at 17%.[iii]

The Center for the Future of Arizona published a report in 2013 titled “The Arizona We Want 2.0”.  As the name indicates, they looked at what Arizonan’s indicated they wanted in a 2009 Gallop Poll.  In the education area, the citizens polled indicated they wanted “to 1) Graduate high school students who are “college-career” ready, 2) Align graduation requirements to national and international standards, and 3) Customize education to meet student goals”.  What has happened in the state since then though, does not align with the people’s priorities.  Rather,

–       “Per student K-12 spending decreases by 21.8% ($783) per student) between FY08 and FY12, the largest percentage decrease among the 50 states.

–       Arizona’s state university budgets are cut $400 million with an additional cut of 20% ($198 million) made in FY13.

–       Joint Technical Education Districts experience 40% budget cuts ($29 million) in FY11.

–       Prop 100 passes in 2010, temporarily raising sales tax by 1 percent to benefit education and other services; Prop 204 fails to make the sales tax increase permanent in 2012.[iv]

 

The Arizona Legislature prides itself on balancing the budget, but doesn’t tell you that they did it on the backs of our public education system.  They love to tout how Arizona offers so much school choice to parents but the truth is that choice is only an option for those who can take advantage of it.  Choice does not guarantee opportunity just as a job does not guarantee wealth.  There are numerous factors that come into play to help determine whether or not parents really have choice in where they send their children.  For example, can the parents complete the sometimes extensive application process, can they transport their children to the school of choice, can they pay for their child’s meals, and do they have time they can take from work to participate in the required volunteer activities.

Yes, Arizona has school choice, but it has become more about choice for the schools, than choice for the parents.  Charter and private schools do not take their “fare share” of special needs and English Learner students, nor are an equitable number of their students from homes in poverty.  In fact, a majority of the school tuition organization scholarships awarded in 2012 went to families with a socio-economic status that should have enabled them to send their children to the private school without help.[v]

So, let’s recap.  A well-educated populace is critical to Arizona’s ability to compete in the near future – 62% of our jobs will require more than a secondary education by 2018.  Currently, over a third of our adult population would not be eligible for these jobs.  As for the remaining 38% of jobs that these people could obtain, they will most likely not pay a living wage.[vi]  Of course, this presupposes that we have enough sufficiently trained people to attract companies with the well-paying jobs and that this in-turn provides enough of a demand in the service industry for those without the prerequisite training.  Poverty in Arizona at 19%, was already 3.1% higher than the US average according to the 2010 U.S. Census.

The bottom line is that the only way Arizona will succeed is if we realize we are all in this together and we work together to solve our systemic problems.  Poverty matters more than any single factor in the success of our school children and having an educated workforce is critical to our economic success.   


[i] Uri Tresiman on poverty’s role in education

[ii] US Dept of Education 2011

[iv] The Arizona We Want 2.0

[vi] Lumina Foundation – Arizona We Want 2.0

In the Public Interest

As a school board member and locally elected guardian of public education, I am concernedThomas photo med_2 that those who would dismantle it are making headway.  Senate Bill 1363 [empowerment scholarship accounts (ESAs)] currently working its way through the Arizona Legislature will siphon off even more funding from our public schools.  It further expands the Arizona ESAs Program to kindergarteners and increases the amount available.[i]  Both the Arizona Education Association (AEA) and Arizona School Board Association (ASBA) oppose the bill and are appealing a Maricopa District Judge ruling that taxpayer dollars may fund private schools.  This, after the Arizona Supreme Court found in 2009 that two similar school voucher programs violated the Arizona Constitution’s ban on aid for religious or private schools.[ii]


The 2011 law gave parents of special needs children access to public education monies and was further expanded for this school year, essentially doubling eligibility to 200,000.[iii]  Funds can be used for curriculum, testing, private school tuition, tutors, special needs services or therapies, or even seed money for college.  The program however, requires parents to waive their child’s right to a public education…a right that is guaranteed under the state constitution, in order to receive the benefits.[iv]


Only 362 students in Arizona had ESAs last year, but 92 percent of ESA funds went to private schools, in many cases for children whose parents could afford the schools without the assistance. For students without special needs, the program provides from $3,000 to $3,500 a year. As this is not nearly sufficient to cover the cost of tuition to a private school (which can be as much as $10,000), the program is unlikely to benefit students from low-income families.[v]  Last year, this voucher program took $5.2 million from public education funding. If SB1363 is passed, amount could potentially increase to over $20 million and public school funding tied to enrollment will likely be reduced.[vi]


Senator Melvin and Representatives Smith and Kwasman continue their campaign against public education by sponsoring this bill.  Senator Melvin has voted against public education at every turn, and he and his fellow legislators have worked to ensure a lack of accountability and transparency in the law includes assurances that no government agency is empowered to “exercise control or supervision over any nonpublic school or home school.” I’m not sure how any reasonable person thinks this is in the best interest of the public, but then, maybe that’s not their intent.


The right answer, whenever public funding is involved, is more accountability and transparency, not less.  It is why we have school boards elected by the public and it is why those school boards must abide by the Open Meeting Law. While empowerment accounts appear to place choice in the hands of parents, the choice is actually in the hands of private schools, which can pick and choose that they admit.[vii]  Taxpayers have the right to know how their money is being used, and what results it produces.  That is in the public’s best interest.

Time for the AZ Legislature to Stop the Shell Game

In her May 15, 2013 article in the Arizona Republic, Mary Jo Pitzl states: The K-12 system would get an $82 million boost, with school districts free to spend

Image

it as they wish. Brewer wanted more targeted spending, particularly to help schools prepare to meet the stricter academic requirements of the Common Core Standards.”[i]  In reality though, isn’t Senator Biggs’ proposal of $82 million just the amount required to comply with a court ruling on January 15, 2013 that says the Legislature must fully pay for the base education budget as mandated by Proposition 301 in 2000?  The requirement to pay the annual inflation adjustments to the base education-funding formula hasn’t happened in the past three years and the court said it must be paid.[ii]  If so, there is NO boost to our K-12 system, in fact they would just be paid back what the voters approved 12 years ago.


According to Arizona Capitol Reports[iii], schools still face the burden of implementing significant new mandates without the resources to do so. The governor proposed spending $41.5 million to implement Common Core and $20 million for technology updates related to Common Core.  Of course the Governor’s proposal of $41.5 million (which is down from an original of $61.5 million) is a far cry from the estimated actual requirement of $156 million statewide to implement Common Core Standards just for the 2014-2015 school year.  In addition to this unfunded expense, is the requirement to upgrade hardware and broadband capabilities for new curriculum and testing at a cost of approximately $225 million. [iv]  Senator Biggs’ budget does nothing to address this shortfall.

It is no surprise the share of tax dollars that winds up in Arizona classrooms has slid to the lowest level in 11 years.[v]  This is directly attributable to the fact that Arizona leads the nation in cuts to per-pupil spending from 2008 to 2012 – almost 22 percent.[vi]

In my school district, this includes no increase in base level amount, no excess utilities funding, no building renewal funding, capital fund reductions, and reductions to maintenance and operations funding. It also includes a one-time $300,000 sweep from our cash balance and the removal of funding for all-day kindergarten.

The Arizona State Legislature has played a shell game with public education funding for many years and it is way beyond time for it to stop.  These are not only children’s lives we are playing with, but also Arizona’s future.

Time to Face the Facts!

Thomas photo med_2A Casa Grande Dispatch article dated April 26, 2013 and titled “Gubernatorial race: Melvin’s bid shuffles the deck in District 11” contained a misleading statement.  The sentence started with “Melvin’s education plan is built around giving every parent a voucher for $9,000…”

It is not true that the state provides close to $9K per pupil to public schools.  Per the Joint Legislative Budget Committee[i], K-12 (M&O, Capital and All Other) funding per student (not adjusted for inflation) has been less than $5K every year since FY04.  In FY11, the amount was $3,897 and the estimated amounts for FY12 and FY13 were even less that that.  In fact, Arizona leads the nation in cuts to per pupil funding since 2008 – almost 22%.

Senator Melvin has oft lauded the Arizona legislature (himself included) for protecting total education funding at over $9K per student.[ii]  Only half the funding however has come from the state.  The rest of it has been federal (some of it stimulus funds which have now gone away) or local funding.

Funding alone won’t guarantee quality schools, but neither will starving our public schools of the basic funds they need to operate, let alone excel.  In addition, our legislature hasn’t even begun to address (although the Governor has proposed $61M in her budget) the unfunded mandate to implement Common Core Standards ($156M for FY14 plus another $225M one-time cost statewide.) It is beyond time to face the real facts and take real action before it is too late.

Wizard of AZ?

ImageState Senator Melvin announced his exploratory committee for Governor.  He says his bid “will focus on giving every school student a $9,000 voucher to attend any school, public or private, of the parent’s choice.” Melvin sees that choice “as the only real solution to improving academic performance.”[i]

Let’s get real!  Arizona has over one million students in public education.[ii]  At $9,000 each, that equals $9 Billion.  Arizona’s entire 2013 budget was only $8.6 Billion.[iii]  Vouchers may put Federal funds at risk and significantly reduce Arizona’s revenue.  Assuming parents will use these vouchers, where is the funding coming from?

Vouchers were deemed unconstitutional in Arizona in 2008.[iv]  Additionally, Arizona has had open enrollment since 1994 and the majority of parents still choose their neighborhood schools (almost 90%.)  Every school should be good!  School choice is not the magic wand Melvin would have us believe, but it may well be a fairy tale.

[i] http://azstarnet.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/elections/state-sen-al-melvin-to-run-for-arizona-governor/article_13f5d53e-ab8f-11e2-b7bb-0019bb2963f4.html

Myths vs. Facts about America’s Public Education

Thomas photo med_2Myth #10 – Anyone Can Teach, Credentials Don’t Matter

  • 2002 Arizona study found students with certified teachers performed about 20 percent better on the tests than students with noncertified teachers (including TFA)
  • Houston study of 4,400 teachers and 132,000 students concluded certified teachers consistently produced significantly higher achievement than uncertified teachers

The Life and Death of the Great American School System:  How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education – Diane Ravitch

Myth #9 – Funding and Class Sizes Don’t Matter

  • Highest funding doesn’t guarantee best performance but, Arizona has the highest cuts per nation in per pupil spending since 2008and we are 46th in education performance
  • In 2006, California began funding reduced class sizes to 20 students in grades K-3, and 25 in grades 4-12 in schools with large numbers of low-income, minority, and English learners – since then, 85% of these schools have met their goals for improving outcomes
  • Finland is consistently one of the highest achievers on the PISA assessments and has some of the smallest class sizes among the OECD nations, averaging 21 or less in all grades

http://www.classsizematters.org/research-and-links

Myth #8 – Schools Should Be Run Like a Business

Business needs to maximize profits, but our children cannot be a standardized “raw material” from which we “throw away” those that do not meet some pre-determined standard and who do not “perform” in the expected manner the way certain raw materials in a factory might be discarded if not felt to be appropriate for the anticipated outcome.

http://www.jamievollmer.com/blueberries.html

Myth #7 – Standardized Testing Results Tell Us Which Teachers Are Good

Standardized testing only encourages teachers to teach to the test and in some cases, even cheat for good scores.

  • Texas, the birthplace of standardized high-stakes tests recently passed its preliminary state budget, designating ZERO dollars, for standardized testing after giving test-maker Pearson a $500 million, five-year contract just last year
  • About 880 Texas school districts, representing 4.4 million students, signed a resolution saying standardized testing (like AIMS and PARCC) is bad for education

http://azstarnet.com/news/opinion/guest-column-the-trend-in-education-is-away-from-standardized/article_9c1b6be4-3a76-5fa1-92eb-4ba9a0b2c5ff.html

Myth #6 – The Problem with Traditional Public Education is Teacher’s Unions

  • If unions are the problem, why:
  • Do those states that do not allow teachers to negotiate binding contracts, such as TX, VA, NV, AZ, and TN, rank in the middle or near the bottom?
  • Do the states with strong teacher’s unions: MA, CT, and NJ, rank at the top?
  • Do charter schools, most of which are non-union, not perform consistently better than comparable neighborhood schools?
  • Does Finland, which is 100% unionized, rank at the top in the 2009 PISA assessments

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek2010/03/18/debate-are-teachers-unions-the-problem-or-the-answer.html

Myth #5 – Traditional Public Schools are Failing our Children and Charter Schools Perform Better

  • A 2009 Stanford University study compared the reading and math state achievement test scores of 70% of U.S. charter school students—to those of their virtual “twins” in traditional public schools who shared with them certain characteristics
  • Only 17% showed any significant growth in math scores over traditional public-school equivalents; 46% were the same and 37% were lower
  • In reading, charter students on average realized a growth less than their public-school counterparts

http://www.usnews.com/education/blogs/on-education/2009/06/17/charter-schools-might-not-be-better

Myth #4 – Poverty Does Not Affect a Child’s Educational Performance

Family income is the single most reliable predicator of student test scores.  Living in a neighborhood with a high poverty rate can mean:

  • 22% do not graduate from high school, compared to 6% of those who’ve never been poor
  • 32% of students who spent more than half their childhoods in poverty do not graduate
  • If the students who dropped out of the 2011 Class had graduated, the nation’s economy would likely see nearly $154 billion in additional income over the course of their lifetimes

http://www.childrensdefense.org/child-research-data-publications/data/soac-2012-handbook.html

Myth #3 – American K-12 Education Ranks Far Behind the Rest of the World

Again, this isn’t true.  On the latest global tests, the U.S. scored higher in poverty-to-poverty comparisons than any other nation in the world

http://www.educationrethink.com/2011/08/10-myths-about-public-education.html

Myth #2 – Early Childhood Education Provides No Appreciable Benefit

  • Disadvantaged children who don’t participate in high-quality early education programs are:  50% more likely to be placed in special education, 25% more likely to drop out of school, 60% more likely to never attend college, 70% more likely to be arrested for a violent crime, 40% more likely to become a teen parent
  • Every dollar spent on early learning programs for at-risk children yields $7 to $9 in future savings on expenditures like special education and prison and can improve America’s competitiveness in a global economy by as much as 16% per year

http://www.good.is/posts/why-early-childhood-education-matters

Myth #1 – School Choice is the Civil Rights Issue of Our Time (Senator Melvin)

The civil rights issue of our time is actually “unequal access to quality education” and this unequal access is largely driven by poverty as shown by these following facts:

  • Thousands of charter schools don’t provide subsidized lunches, putting them out of reach for families in poverty
  • Hundreds mandate that parents spend hours doing “volunteer” work for the school or risk losing their child’s seat
  • The vast majority require parents to transport their children to the charter school
  • Application procedures can be extensive (handwritten essays, references and exams)

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/15/us-usa-charters-admissions-idUSBRE91E0HF20130215