Wizard of AZ?

ImageState Senator Melvin announced his exploratory committee for Governor.  He says his bid “will focus on giving every school student a $9,000 voucher to attend any school, public or private, of the parent’s choice.” Melvin sees that choice “as the only real solution to improving academic performance.”[i]

Let’s get real!  Arizona has over one million students in public education.[ii]  At $9,000 each, that equals $9 Billion.  Arizona’s entire 2013 budget was only $8.6 Billion.[iii]  Vouchers may put Federal funds at risk and significantly reduce Arizona’s revenue.  Assuming parents will use these vouchers, where is the funding coming from?

Vouchers were deemed unconstitutional in Arizona in 2008.[iv]  Additionally, Arizona has had open enrollment since 1994 and the majority of parents still choose their neighborhood schools (almost 90%.)  Every school should be good!  School choice is not the magic wand Melvin would have us believe, but it may well be a fairy tale.

[i] http://azstarnet.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/elections/state-sen-al-melvin-to-run-for-arizona-governor/article_13f5d53e-ab8f-11e2-b7bb-0019bb2963f4.html

Former Lt. Gov. Ratliff of Texas Joins the Honor Roll

OMG!!! This speech could SOOOO have been given in Arizona as well.

dianeravitch's avatarDiane Ravitch's blog

Former Lieutenant Governor Bill Ratliff has spoken out loud and clear for the 5 million children in public schools in Texas. He knows the state cut the budget way too much. He knows that the state must put its money into improving education–not by “throwing money” at it–but by doing the right things.

And he knows that the Legislature will be moved when they start hearing from angry Mamas. They are hearing from those Mamas. And they are backing away from the strange idea that they can cut teachers and fund testing.

I place Mr. Ratliff’s name on the honor roll as a champion of public education. Read the speech below, and you will see that he is looking out for the children of Texas, who need strong protectors like him.

Here is a speech he gave a few weeks ago. I am happy to post it here:

“RAISE YOUR…

View original post 1,845 more words

Breaking News! California Democratic Party Blasts Corporate Education Reform: UPDATE

Maybe the AZ Dems Party needs to take a look at this!

dianeravitch's avatarDiane Ravitch's blog

The California Democratic Party passed a resolution opposing corporate education reform.

It specifically criticized Michelle Rhee’s StudentsFirst and the Wall Street hedge fund managers’ group called “Democrats for Education Reform” as fronts for Republicans and corporate interests.

See the story in the Los Angeles Times here. The headline repeats the “reform” claim that they just want to “overhaul” schools, when the resolution below correctly describes their agenda.

The message is getting out. The public is beginning to understand the privatizers’ game of talking “reform” and “great teachers” while dismantling public education and the teaching profession.

This is great news!

Here is the resolution:

Supporting California’s Public Schools and Dispelling the Corporate “Reform” Agenda
Whereas, the reform initiatives of Students First, rely on destructive anti-educator policies that do nothing for students but blame educators and their unions for the ills of society, make testing the goal of education, shatter communities…

View original post 220 more words

Arizona Education: A Pocket-lining, “Conflict of Interest” Mecca

AZ…leading the way once again (not in a good way)

deutsch29's avatardeutsch29: Mercedes Schneider's Blog

I am from Louisiana, and ethics in general in Louisiana has its tarnished reputation, for sure.  However, I have never witnessed anything quite like the Arizona legislature’s conflict of interest definition. The entire regulation hinges upon the distinction between a public officer’s having a “substantial interest” or a “remote interest” in some transaction that could benefit the public official.  Those with a “substantial interest” are to “refrain” from participating in transactions that benefit them.

“Substantial interest”: Refrain. Sounds good.

The Danger of “Remote Control”

The definition of “remote interest” is what makes Arizona’s conflict of interest guidelines virtually useless.  In short, if nine others stand to benefit in equal measure to the potential benefit gained by the public official, then the transaction is not restricted.

Go ahead and take a moment to read that last sentence one more time.

It gets better: There is no established agency to oversee, monitor, investigate, or otherwise determine whether a…

View original post 3,403 more words

AZ Legislature Continues to Discriminate

Thomas photo med_2April 9, 2013, the AZ Legislature unanimously adopted House Concurrent Resolution 2036[i] titled “Boy Scouts of America.”  Eighty legislators sponsored this bi-partisan bill[ii] whose intent was allegedly to “honor the Boy Scouts of America for its contributions to the lives of our nation’s boys and young men.”  I believe there is another intended message.

The resolution states the Boy Scouts “teaches respect for the beliefs of others” and “is a model for inclusiveness.” Excluding gay boys from membership is hardly “a model of inclusiveness” as it: 1) proudly excludes gay boys, thereby teaching boys that gays are lesser, unworthy people; 2) keeps gay boys ensconced in the closet damaging their self-worth; and 3) likely contributed to the methodical cover up of suspected child molesters.[iii]

The Boy Scouts recently reported its unanimous consensus for its “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy.  They are way behind the power curve.  The Supreme Court is currently considering the status of the Defense of Marriage Act and the Department of Defense has already ended its discriminatory “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy. As a retired Air Force Colonel who served 22 years and realized late in my career I was a lesbian, I can personally attest to the wasted energy expended by gay and lesbian service members to keep their true selves a secret.  I know a retired Naval Captain who was assigned to the Pentagon in 2001.  Having left her office for a meeting just seven minutes prior to the airplane impact, it was on this day she decided to retire from her 28-year career.  She realized if she’d been killed, her partner of 11 years would have been the last to know about her death, as she had not listed her as “next of kin” for fear of being “outed”.[iv]

As a former Program Director of Wingspan, Southern Arizona’s LGBT Community Center, I learned 20 to 40% of homeless youth on the streets are LGBT[v] and about the pervasive bullying of gay children that still goes on in our schools by children and the adults they are entrusted to.  LGBT youth are four times more likely to commit suicide than their heterosexual counterparts and nearly twice as likely to have been verbally harassed and/or physically assaulted as school while believing they have no adult they can talk to about personal problems.  More than 45% of LGBT youth report that their state government is not accepting of LGBT people.[vi]

The Arizona Legislature has once again proven they do not represent all the people of Arizona.  This resolution was an unnecessary piece of legislation intended to send a message of support to a discriminatory organization.  After all, where is the concurrent resolution in support of the Girl Scouts who by the way don’t feel the need to exclude lesbian girls?  I was a Girl Scout and am grateful for the experience it afforded me and wish for every child that same opportunity – to be the very best of who they are.

Diversity has always been one of our nation’s strengths.  It is one of the reasons I am proud to be a citizen of these United States.  Today however, I am not proud to be an Arizonan.

Myths vs. Facts about America’s Public Education

Thomas photo med_2Myth #10 – Anyone Can Teach, Credentials Don’t Matter

  • 2002 Arizona study found students with certified teachers performed about 20 percent better on the tests than students with noncertified teachers (including TFA)
  • Houston study of 4,400 teachers and 132,000 students concluded certified teachers consistently produced significantly higher achievement than uncertified teachers

The Life and Death of the Great American School System:  How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education – Diane Ravitch

Myth #9 – Funding and Class Sizes Don’t Matter

  • Highest funding doesn’t guarantee best performance but, Arizona has the highest cuts per nation in per pupil spending since 2008and we are 46th in education performance
  • In 2006, California began funding reduced class sizes to 20 students in grades K-3, and 25 in grades 4-12 in schools with large numbers of low-income, minority, and English learners – since then, 85% of these schools have met their goals for improving outcomes
  • Finland is consistently one of the highest achievers on the PISA assessments and has some of the smallest class sizes among the OECD nations, averaging 21 or less in all grades

http://www.classsizematters.org/research-and-links

Myth #8 – Schools Should Be Run Like a Business

Business needs to maximize profits, but our children cannot be a standardized “raw material” from which we “throw away” those that do not meet some pre-determined standard and who do not “perform” in the expected manner the way certain raw materials in a factory might be discarded if not felt to be appropriate for the anticipated outcome.

http://www.jamievollmer.com/blueberries.html

Myth #7 – Standardized Testing Results Tell Us Which Teachers Are Good

Standardized testing only encourages teachers to teach to the test and in some cases, even cheat for good scores.

  • Texas, the birthplace of standardized high-stakes tests recently passed its preliminary state budget, designating ZERO dollars, for standardized testing after giving test-maker Pearson a $500 million, five-year contract just last year
  • About 880 Texas school districts, representing 4.4 million students, signed a resolution saying standardized testing (like AIMS and PARCC) is bad for education

http://azstarnet.com/news/opinion/guest-column-the-trend-in-education-is-away-from-standardized/article_9c1b6be4-3a76-5fa1-92eb-4ba9a0b2c5ff.html

Myth #6 – The Problem with Traditional Public Education is Teacher’s Unions

  • If unions are the problem, why:
  • Do those states that do not allow teachers to negotiate binding contracts, such as TX, VA, NV, AZ, and TN, rank in the middle or near the bottom?
  • Do the states with strong teacher’s unions: MA, CT, and NJ, rank at the top?
  • Do charter schools, most of which are non-union, not perform consistently better than comparable neighborhood schools?
  • Does Finland, which is 100% unionized, rank at the top in the 2009 PISA assessments

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek2010/03/18/debate-are-teachers-unions-the-problem-or-the-answer.html

Myth #5 – Traditional Public Schools are Failing our Children and Charter Schools Perform Better

  • A 2009 Stanford University study compared the reading and math state achievement test scores of 70% of U.S. charter school students—to those of their virtual “twins” in traditional public schools who shared with them certain characteristics
  • Only 17% showed any significant growth in math scores over traditional public-school equivalents; 46% were the same and 37% were lower
  • In reading, charter students on average realized a growth less than their public-school counterparts

http://www.usnews.com/education/blogs/on-education/2009/06/17/charter-schools-might-not-be-better

Myth #4 – Poverty Does Not Affect a Child’s Educational Performance

Family income is the single most reliable predicator of student test scores.  Living in a neighborhood with a high poverty rate can mean:

  • 22% do not graduate from high school, compared to 6% of those who’ve never been poor
  • 32% of students who spent more than half their childhoods in poverty do not graduate
  • If the students who dropped out of the 2011 Class had graduated, the nation’s economy would likely see nearly $154 billion in additional income over the course of their lifetimes

http://www.childrensdefense.org/child-research-data-publications/data/soac-2012-handbook.html

Myth #3 – American K-12 Education Ranks Far Behind the Rest of the World

Again, this isn’t true.  On the latest global tests, the U.S. scored higher in poverty-to-poverty comparisons than any other nation in the world

http://www.educationrethink.com/2011/08/10-myths-about-public-education.html

Myth #2 – Early Childhood Education Provides No Appreciable Benefit

  • Disadvantaged children who don’t participate in high-quality early education programs are:  50% more likely to be placed in special education, 25% more likely to drop out of school, 60% more likely to never attend college, 70% more likely to be arrested for a violent crime, 40% more likely to become a teen parent
  • Every dollar spent on early learning programs for at-risk children yields $7 to $9 in future savings on expenditures like special education and prison and can improve America’s competitiveness in a global economy by as much as 16% per year

http://www.good.is/posts/why-early-childhood-education-matters

Myth #1 – School Choice is the Civil Rights Issue of Our Time (Senator Melvin)

The civil rights issue of our time is actually “unequal access to quality education” and this unequal access is largely driven by poverty as shown by these following facts:

  • Thousands of charter schools don’t provide subsidized lunches, putting them out of reach for families in poverty
  • Hundreds mandate that parents spend hours doing “volunteer” work for the school or risk losing their child’s seat
  • The vast majority require parents to transport their children to the charter school
  • Application procedures can be extensive (handwritten essays, references and exams)

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/15/us-usa-charters-admissions-idUSBRE91E0HF20130215

Why Texas Is Sick of The Testing Mania

Arizona now needs to follow suit!

dianeravitch's avatarDiane Ravitch's blog

Texas is fed up with the testing obsession. The state has handed over nearly a billion dollars to Pearson in recent years, even as the Legislature cut $5.4 Billion from public education.

For an insiders’ view of the revolt against high-stakes testing in Texas, read Jason Stanford.

He says only two people in the state still defend the testing deluge, and one of them is paid to lobby for Pearson.

That would be Sandy Kress, the same man who is widely acknowledged as the architect of No Child Left Behind. In recent years, he has served on state advisory commissions, testified in favor of more and more testing, written opinion pieces in favor of testing.

But now the game is up. 86% of school boards across the state have said no to high-stakes testing. Moms have organized to fight it. The Legislature is listening. Texas is the place where…

View original post 19 more words

Tough Love Solves Problems

RMM7259I moved to Arizona almost five years ago, after visiting family here for over 30 years because I love it here!  But, after five years, I also understand we have our share of problems.  One is legislators who are big on ideology and rhetoric, but low on facing facts and finding solutions.

Clearly from his guest opinion in the March 6th Explorer, LD11’s Senator Melvin either doesn’t know Arizona has problems, or believes they only exist because the “left-wingers” aren’t on board.  Here’s some facts that help describe the “wellness” of our State with regard to business climate and education.

FACT:  Arizona was recently ranked the 47th worst run state in America[i]

FACT:  Arizona’s business startup rate has been relatively high, but, many of these were sole proprietors (no other employees) who started a business because they lost their jobs. This ‘jobless entrepreneurship’ trend negatively affects job creation and the larger economic recovery.”[ii]

FACT:  In terms of job gains, Senator Melvin is correct, in the decade preceding 2012, Arizona ranked fourth in private sector job creation, while our population rose at the second highest rate in the country.  Keep in mind, that he didn’t take office until 2009 and any legislative impact he had on jobs, most likely didn’t take affect until at least 2010.[iii]

FACT:  Arizona’s most plentiful future jobs aren’t going to be “living wage” jobs unless something changes.  Most of them between 2012 and 2016 are predicted to be low paying:  retail sales, customer service, cashiers, waitresses and waiters, janitors and housekeepers, food prep and service.[iv]  Only one of these jobs (customer service) result in a living wage for a family of three if combined with another of these jobs. In other words, someone working two of these jobs still doesn’t earn a living wage.[v]

FACT:  Arizona’s Legislature’s “Balanced Budget” has impacted our wallets.  For example, Highway User Revenue Fund (HURF) from fuel tax, vehicle registration and licensing, etc., is supposed to pay for roads and road repairs.  The state legislature has taken over $200 million of these funds from cities and towns, using money meant for fixing potholes to shore up budget holes instead.[vi]   Another is the $50M that was taken from the national mortgage assistance settlement in 2010.  It should have gone directly to families suffering because banks gambled with their mortgages, and the families lost – thanks to our legislators, Arizona families lost twice.[vii]

There is a strong correlation between well-educated populations and generally well-managed states, as cited by at least one rating source, so let’s look at education.

FACT:  State-appropriated funding for education declined to an estimated $3,780 per student in fiscal 2012 from $4,901 in fiscal 2008. This was a decline of $1,121 per student — or about 23 percent.[viii]

FACT:  Mortgaging the state buildings raised $735 million in immediate revenue, but cost us more than 63% ($465 million) that much in interest.[ix]

FACT:  In 2011, ALEC’s 17th Report Card, ranked Arizona at #36 on National Association of Educational Performance (NAEP).[x]  The 2013 Quality Counts Report ranked Arizona 43rd with a C- grade in the nation in educational policy and performance.[xi]

FACT:  Of the four school districts Senator Melvin cited as “outstanding”, only the Catalina Foothills United District was awarded an “A” grade by the Arizona Department of Education, under the state’s new A-F accountability system.[xii]

FACT:  There is no requirement to measure Arizona’s home school program and in fact, state law prohibits the state Department of Education from requiring testing or reporting of test results.[xiii] It’s anyone’s guess how well home schooling works in Arizona, and my guess is that not all of it is “great”.

FACT:  The Individual Tax Credit program favors private schools by a factor of five to one and the Corporate Income Tax Credit contributions have grown to over $55M in 2010, all monies not available to the State general fund.[xiv]

FACT:  Of the tax credit money given to School Tuition Organizations (STOs) for private schools in 2012, 63.2% of the scholarships went to children in families with incomes from 185% of poverty level ($41,348 for a family of four) to greater than 342.25% of poverty level ($76,494 for a family of four).  Keep in mind the law also allows these STOs to keep 10% of the tax credits themselves.[xv]

In his guest opinion last week, Senator Melvin said:  “we need to pull together and not engage in class warfare, including the left’s fixation of soaking the so-called rich.  By pulling together we can all succeed.”

With this accusation, he continues to be archaic and divisive.  Arizona is better than that.  We can all come together, but we need straight talk and inclusive action from our politicians.

A politician thinks about the next election, a leader things about the next generation.  Melvin says a leader shouldn’t mortgage the next generation.  We agree, but isn’t that exactly what he did with the state capitol buildings?


[xiii] AZleg.gov

Perfect storm may threaten public schools

Thomas photo med_2Perfect storm may threaten public schools

This opinion is my own and does not represent that of the Oracle school board.

The share of tax dollars that winds up in Arizona classrooms has slid to the lowest level in 12 years primarily because education funding has declined significantly. In fact, Arizona leads the nation in cuts to per-pupil spending from 2008 to 2012 – almost 22 percent.

In the Oracle School District, this includes no increase in base level amount, no excess utilities funding, no building renewal funding, capital fund reductions, and reductions to maintenance and operations funding. It also includes a one-time $300,000 sweep from our cash balance and the removal of funding for all-day kindergarten.

This, while state Sen. Al Melvin claims the Arizona Legislature has “moved heaven and earth” to ensure education is properly funded.

So far, we’ve made it work. But cash reserves are dwindling, and tough decisions loom. Now we have the unfunded mandate of implementing Common Core Standards, and the potential effect of sequestration. Is a perfect storm looming?

Linda Thomas

Oracle school board member, Oracle